Why Encouragement Can Be Bad For Business

Why Encouragement Can Be Bad For Business

Letter board with the message "You Can Do This" on a yellow background

People in business get used to handling criticism. But encouragement is a different can of worms.

Not only does it bypass the muscles we grow to deal with challenges, it hits extra hard precisely because of all those challenges. Sort of like how even bad fast food tastes good when you haven’t eaten all day.

Finally, some kind words! Finally, somebody recognizes that my idea is good!

When encouragement comes from people who know us and support us, it’s easy to absorb. Of course my friend wants me to succeed. He wouldn’t be saying my business concept is great if he thought it would blow up in my face and I’d lose my life savings. But wanting what’s best for someone and actually giving helpful advice are two different things.

The encouragement of people who don’t know us is powerful in a different way. They come across as objective observers with nothing to gain by being nice, which makes them seem more credible. But a few kind words cost a stranger almost nothing, and taken too much to heart, they can throw you off course.

Encouragement Can Bypass Critical Thinking

Friends and family who say, “You bake great cakes, you should open a bakery” mean well but their words should factor very little into such a decision. They’re not thinking about whether you’d enjoy baking 60 hours a week, or the cost of a lease, or what you’d be giving up to pursue it. The encouragement skips straight from “you’re good at this” to “you should build your life around it” with nothing in between.

There’s also a common attitude of “just give it a try, what’s the worst that could happen?” But there are an infinite number of things you could try. That alone isn’t a reason to do any particular one of them. Especially when “trying” means investing a lot of your time and money, not the time and money of the cheerleader. When somebody knows you for five minutes and encourages you to “follow your passion,” this might be pleasant, but it’s not valuable advice.

And once you’ve acted on someone’s encouragement, it develops its own momentum. You’ve told people about it, maybe spent money, maybe turned down other opportunities. Now you’re not just pursuing an idea, you’re defending a decision. The encouragement that got you started has long since evaporated, but you’re still living with the consequences.

There’s also a subtler version of this. Someone suggests an idea you aren’t interested in, and suddenly you’re in the position of explaining why you’re not doing it. “You like Roman history, you should start a YouTube channel about Rome.” Now instead of working on your business, you’re having a conversation about why you don’t want to start a YouTube channel. Other people’s enthusiasm for their idea of what you should do can become its own distraction, even if you never act on it.

Enjoy the kind words. Then make your decisions without them.

Results, Not Cheerleading

If you need writing done for you, contact me. I’m here to help.

What Gets Worked on Gets Done

What Gets Worked on Gets Done

A full can of roasted almonds next to several empty cans of salted peanuts on a wooden table
Image created with ChatGPT

Why do projects get stuck? Why is progress too slow?

Sometimes the answer might be complicated and nuanced, but in many cases, it’s simple. Progress often comes down to what gets worked on consistently.

Peanuts vs. Almonds

Every morning after going on a run I eat some yogurt for breakfast. Nuts are one of my go-to yogurt toppings. I have a can of almonds that’s nine months old. In that same time, I’ve gone through four cans of peanuts.

The progress toward finishing the almonds isn’t stuck because they are harder to eat, or I don’t know how, need somebody’s help, or they cost more. In fact they’re the easiest choice already because I own them and don’t have to buy anything.

Meanwhile, I got through four cans of peanuts not because I’ve dedicated a lot of time, skill, or effort to the task. I only have a few a day so it’s hardly like I’m pushing to finish them quickly.

It’s simply that I prefer their flavor, so make a little progress consistently. Over time the difference between a tiny bit of daily action and no action adds up.

The Peanut Test

For everything you do that’s either stuck or progressing slower than you’d like, before looking for any complicated reason, it’s worth applying the peanut test. Are you working on it consistently?

If you are working consistently and it’s still truly stuck, you can now look into the less obvious causes.

But if the answer is that it isn’t being worked on, you’ve found a proverbial can of almonds. The reasons and justifications for not working on it are a different topic. They may be logical or they may be empty excuses. Either way, they don’t change the mechanical fact that it isn’t progressing because it isn’t being worked on.

Conclusion

The more I’ve thought about it the more value I see in stating the obvious. Some things are so apparent they are easy to overlook. When they’re overlooked it’s easy to spend time and energy searching for a complicated answer, when the real answer was the obvious one all along.

If writing or marketing has been your can of almonds, something you know matters but hasn’t been getting consistent attention, I can take it off your plate. Let me know what you need done.

Working Hard on Everything Except What Matters

Working Hard on Everything Except What Matters

To-do list with every small task checked off except the last item, "Work on product", which is left unchecked
Image created with ChatGPT

When people avoid work it’s often easy to spot. But what about using one type of work to avoid doing another type? That can get a lot less obvious and more complicated to address.

Why Would Anyone Do This?

Sometimes making progress means we have to do things we don’t like.

If I dread talking on the phone, and getting new customers means more phone calls, I have an incentive to do every type of work other than what will generate new customers.

I could reorganize the office, work on my logo, do some research, and go to bed tired with a long list of things I’d accomplished. None of them brought me closer to getting new customers, but I could supply ten reasons why my work was useful and necessary. Then I’d wonder why business is so slow when I’m working this hard. On some level, though, I’m rewarded because I don’t have to talk on the phone.

This sort of “avoidance work” lets people stay in their comfort zone, while appearing to work at some goal, without making effective progress toward that goal.

Man scratching his head while comparing two nearly identical logo options on a wall
Image created with ChatGPT

Common examples of this behavior include:

  • Stuck in the planning, research, and review stage. This one is particularly insidious because these things are very legitimate and useful activities, so it’s easy to hide behind them while looking responsible but avoiding progress.

  • Getting sidetracked by graphic design or trivial details. If “We can’t start because the logo isn’t right” means a month-long delay finding a graphic designer, that’s a problem.

  • Using fear, perfectionism, or both to keep things stuck. Progress is slowed in the name of being cautious, or for getting things “just right.”

  • Constantly generating ideas but not picking something to start. Allows people to say, “Hey I’m working hard being creative” without having to knuckle down and make the idea happen, or risk failing.

  • Picking things then regularly abandoning them before they are completed. By picking something there is the appearance of progress, but then there’s always some reason why it wasn’t finished. Might be “bad workers,” bad weather, the economy these days, grandma’s funeral. Something always gets in the way. Eventually, though, because of luck or enough pressure to deliver something tangible, a project might get completed. How can it be sabotaged then? By not giving it the support it needs, or abandoning it at the first real obstacle.

These behaviors are particularly damaging to your business because they combine apparent reasonableness, real work, and unconscious motivations. People doing these things aren’t obviously lazing around. Nor are they doing clearly useless busywork. Nor are they necessarily self-aware that they’re avoiding something.

They are working and have plausible justifications for their actions. They may believe themselves to be really truly making progress, working hard and smart, toward the larger stated goal. And some real progress might get made from time to time!

The Value of Awareness

So the question becomes, what can we do about this kind of behavior pattern?

For people who do this and know they do it, and don’t want to change, nothing I say will matter anyway.

If you recognize yourself in some of these behaviors now, and this comes as a surprise to you, then there’s hope to change.

If your employee acts this way, recognizing it gives you an opportunity to intervene.

If your boss or business client does this, it’s good to understand the behaviors, but there’s not a lot you can do to change such a person.

Simply being aware of avoidance work is valuable. Once you see it and recognize what’s going on, a lot of mysteries disappear. If one or more people engage in avoidance work but it’s up to them for the project to progress, there might be a lot of apparent activity, but not a lot of results where it matters.

There’s no need to reexamine the data or look for a missing piece to explain why things are stuck. You’ve found it.

How to Find Your Real Business Priorities

How to Find Your Real Business Priorities

Man driving on the highway while taking an online meeting with his phone
Image created with Gemini

Here’s a quick story about priorities. I had a client, let’s call him Eric, who was in charge of marketing at a large ecommerce company.

I took part in weekly marketing meetings, where people proposed ideas, discussed current projects, and talked about problems that needed to be solved.

Early on Eric would run the meetings himself, sharing his screen, and would decide on which topics to discuss. As time went by, he had other people write up the agenda for him, and started taking the meeting while driving to the office.

There are a couple ways to look at this. From one perspective it’s being industrious and efficient. Let someone else spend time making the agenda. Maybe the meetings wouldn’t happen at all if they didn’t happen in his car. While some people listen to This Week’s Top 40 on the radio, he’s being productive, holding a meeting.

The other perspective isn’t so kind. People show their real priorities by how they spend their time and attention. If the guy in charge of marketing can’t put aside an hour each week to be at his desk for the marketing meeting, that’s telling us something important about his priorities.

When he can’t see anything being presented in the meeting, and we’re interrupted for his Starbucks order, it sends a message that this isn’t something he takes seriously. Why should anyone involved care more than he does?

Wait, I do this too?

It’s easy to judge this sort of behavior and it deserves to be judged. But at the same time it’s worth doing a self-audit of our own “car meetings.”

What is it, as business owners, that we say is important to do, but then gets put on the back burner? Or done in a procedural way, going through the motions just to check it off the list, without accomplishing anything?

Action-Based Questions to Find Your Real Priorities

If your projects or progress is stuck, but there’s not a clear reason why, knowing what your “car meetings” are can be the missing piece to understanding what’s going on.

How do you find them? Look at the behavior, not the words:

  • The first thing you do = priority
  • What’s left until the end of the day = not priority

  • Thing that gets your full attention, even if you had a prior commitment = priority
  • Thing that’s jammed in around other items or “multitasked” with partial attention = not priority

  • What you work on today, even if you didn’t plan for it = priority
  • What will be done “tomorrow” (that always seems one more day away) = not priority

  • When an obstacle arises, you redouble your efforts = priority 
  • When an obstacle arises, you falter and make excuses = not priority

This filter does not rely on how I “feel” about anything. Words, perceptions, and internal reactions have no bearing on answering the question of whether I’m prioritizing something. Nor does it matter if what I’m doing is difficult or easy, impressive or contemptible, or if I enjoy it or not.

Look at the actions. They will tell you everything about the real priorities.

AI Video Generators Struggle with Simple Sequences

AI Video Generators Struggle with Simple Sequences

Veo and other AI video generators make it easy to bring your wildest visions to life, right?

While they can indeed be good for wild visions, they have a lot more trouble with mundane things you’d think would be easy. Sequences of specific actions tend to come out wrong. For instance, the AI will reverse the order, add unnecessary movements, or show results before causes.

If you’re making videos, this is useful to keep in mind, to keep you from putting too much time and too many credits down the drain, trying to make something work that AI simply isn’t capable of creating yet.

It’s doubly good to keep in mind if you’re starting out, and not too familiar with AI video behavior. In that stage it can be harder to distinguish whether the problem is lack of experience, or the AI itself.

I have a lot of examples in my AI outtake vault of video generations that screw up mundane subjects and get cause and effect backward.

To keep this blog from being 50 pages long I’ll focus here on three examples.

Stepping in a Puddle

To advertise residential walkway installation, I wanted to show someone with nice shoes stepping into a mud puddle, as if he didn’t see it until too late.

Here’s the prompt I used: “Close up of a man wearing dress shoes, socks, and pants walking along a worn grass trail in a yard. Without hesitation he steps into a muddy puddle, as if he didn’t see the puddle before he stepped into it, and continues walking.”

No matter how specific I got or how many variations I generated, it always put something extra into the act of stepping in a puddle that made it look strange.

Muddy Footprints

For a later scene I wanted to show muddy shoe prints that somebody had tracked into a nice house.

Here’s the prompt I used: “Close-up overhead shot of clean carpeted floor with fresh brown muddy shoe prints tracked across, dirt and water marks from shoes, indoor lighting.”

Instead of showing footprints being tracked in by someone walking, the AI just made them appear on the carpet out of nowhere. Result before cause.

You can see the finished walkway ad here.

Putting on a Backpack

For a different project, about staircases for waterfront properties, I wanted a simple shot of someone putting on a backpack.

Here’s the prompt I used: “Close-up shot of hands with short fingernails putting on a green canvas hiking backpack. Man wearing dark jeans and red flannel shirt. Professional lighting, indoor setting.”

I tried a bunch of versions and the AI kept having him fidget with the pack instead of putting it on, or put it on his stomach, or pick it up in some other unnatural way. Eventually I got a clip that was passable, but the backpack straps still phase through his body in an impossible manner.

Most people won’t notice so I used the clip, but it goes to show how a very simple action can be a tough nut to crack.

You can see the finished staircases ad here.

Takeaway

If you’re trying to generate something that involves a sequence of actions, and your AI is struggling, my advice is to set a cutoff for yourself and just pivot to something else if you don’t get what you want by your cutoff.

It’s worth exploring your ideas and not giving up too early, but at the same time, sometimes it really is the AI’s limits that are the issue.

Being able to recognize that will save you time and credits.

Struggling With an AI Video Project?

If you’re burning through credits and not getting what you want, contact me for a second opinion, or I may be able to take the whole thing off your hands. Click here to learn more about my AI work.

It’s Worth Completing Your Upwork Profile

It’s Worth Completing Your Upwork Profile

A marker near circles with checkmarks on white paper.

In the first post I wrote on this site, I had this advice about filling out your Upwork profile:

“Spend time to write a well-thought-out profile, free of typos and talking about your skills and services, with a good picture of yourself. Don’t agonize over it like it’s going to be a hugely important factor in getting you hired. And don’t get hung up on making it ‘100% Complete’ according to Upwork.”

Since then I’ve put a lot more miles on Upwork. I figure it’s useful to revisit some of my older advice and share new things I’ve learned along the way.

If you’re just starting out, I still agree with my original advice. You need the basics but absolutely do not need “100% Complete” on your profile to start getting jobs. Sending out proposals is a better use of your time.

Once you’re established or have extra time, though, it’s worth coming back to fill out the profile more fully. It’s easier than it may appear to reach 100% Complete status.

Profile completion is measured by whether you fill out various sections, each counting for a certain number of percentage points. The required items—photo, overview, at least one employment history entry, and skill tags—get you to 50%. The other 50% comes from optional sections like portfolio items, education, a profile video, linked accounts, and certifications. You can mix and match however you want to reach 100%. (For the full breakdown, here’s Upwork’s official help article.)

For a long time I thought to reach Complete status I had to fill out ALL the sections. In reality, I could choose whichever combination I wanted, as long as they totaled up to 100%.

In order to get “Top Rated Plus” freelancer status, you need a completed profile. Given how competitive Upwork is, anything that helps you stand out is valuable. Missing out on a status badge because your profile is incomplete is missing an opportunity.

While a completed profile is not likely to cause a paradigm shift in how many clients you get, it helps put a little extra wind in your sails.

My current advice is it’s worth taking an hour or so to check this off the to-do list.

If you found this useful and want to work together—or just have a question or comment—you can reach me here.

AI Quick Comparison for Business Owners: 2026

AI Quick Comparison for Business Owners: 2026

Four AI self-portraits side by side: Claude's glowing orb in a night sky, ChatGPT's friendly robot in an office, Grok's colorful swirling human profile, and Gemini's wireframe digital head with code in the background

There are a ton of AI options out there. In this post I’ll go over some major pros and cons of Claude, ChatGPT, Grok, and Gemini.

I’m not affiliated with any of these companies. This review isn’t about their controversies. It’s simply looking at the state of the tools themselves and how they might be useful to you.

Claude

Claude's self-portrait: a glowing warm orb with radiating lines against a dark blue night sky with scattered stars
Self-portrait

It’s the only one I pay for currently, with the Pro plan at $20 per month. Claude is the best AI for writing that I’ve found. It consistently works better than ChatGPT, Grok, and Gemini in this regard. It also does a generally satisfactory job at research.

Claude’s biggest downside right now is simply usage limits. They aren’t extreme for the Pro plan, but you don’t have to be a power user to hit the daily usage cap.

When you hit the limit there are three options: Wait for the timer to run out; pay as you go; or upgrade the overall subscription.

One of Claude’s current verbal tics is to put the word “actually” into a lot of things. This happens to the point where I use “actually” less in my human writing so people don’t think I’m AI!

As of this writing, Claude can’t generate images with as much versatility as the others on this list. It created the self-portrait you see as an SVG file, which I converted into a JPG for upload.

ChatGPT

ChatGPT's self-portrait: a friendly robot wearing a gray blazer and headset, with large teal eyes, standing in a bright office with plants and bookshelves
Self-portrait

The free plan doesn’t write as well as Claude, but it does offer a slightly different perspective on things. This is useful for checking the research of one AI against the other or and coming up with extra ideas.

ChatGPT’s ability to create images has improved a lot in the last couple of years. It can usually spell words correctly now and people have the right number of fingers.

For generic queries like basic research or math problems, free ChatGPT works fine. There’s no need to use up credits on whatever other AI you might be paying for.

ChatGPT still likes em dashes and colons too much, though their frequency has gone down from the glory days. It’s also greatly reduced its use of words like ensure, showcase, key, and highlight from the GPT-4o era.

More recently, ChatGPT’s default personality has gotten condescending. It will assure the user that “you’re not wrong, you aren’t imagining this.” As if we need this reassurance.

Grok

Grok's self-portrait: a human profile in swirling purple, pink, and blue colors with cosmic elements, against a dark abstract painted background
Self-portrait

Of the four AIs on this list, in my experience free Grok is the weakest. It follows instructions less closely and the writing can be longwinded. For example, when I ask if a text contains inaccuracies, it will create a wordy output listing off everything that is correct too, instead of just pointing out what was inaccurate. The core of its response tends to get lost in the sauce as a result of this.

For casual use Grok can generate images about as well as ChatGPT and Gemini.

Despite its limitations, Grok is still useful to have in your AI rotation, both for its slightly different perspective in research and writing, and as just another option when you’ve run out of credits somewhere else.

Gemini

Gemini's self-portrait: a translucent wireframe human head and shoulders made of glowing blue and purple connected nodes, surrounded by floating code and circuit patterns, labeled "AI Portrait - Self_Assembly_V7.1"
Self-portrait

Free Gemini does all the basics and doesn’t have particularly annoying personality quirks. What I’ve said about ChatGPT and Grok applies here in terms of Gemini being useful for basic writing, cross checking, supplemental research, and just not using your paid credits when you don’t have to.

Judging which free AI creates the best images is a bit subjective, but if I were to pick one based on gut feeling more than anything, I’d pick Gemini. (Not comparing the self-portraits but just in general.)

Want the benefits without the learning curve?

If you’d rather not deal with too much AI yourself, I can handle that side of your projects for you. Learn more about my AI Wrangler service.

How to Know If You’re Offering Too Much

How to Know If You're Offering Too Much

Go-kart racers on indoor track.

How do we know when we’re being too narrow and leaving money on the table, or too broad and diluting ourselves?

This post isn’t directly about writing, but it’s something I think about as someone who helps businesses figure out how to present themselves effectively.

You can specialize what you offer in order to strongly appeal to people who need that particular thing. This might exclude plenty of other business you could do.

But if you advertise everything you could do, you risk coming across as unfocused, and confuse your customers.

The dilemma gets summed up in dueling platitudes: “Jack of all trades, master of none” vs. “The one-trick pony gets shot first.”

Hamburgers and go-karts have nothing to do with each other. But a food court inside a go-kart facility makes sense, because hungry people are already there at lunch time. It’s a valuable add-on that makes sense in context.

The same people who like go-karts also need to do their laundry every now and then, but they’re unlikely to haul their dirty socks to a go-kart laundromat. Putting these things together just makes a bizarre combination.

Valuable Add-On vs. Unrelated Distraction

Ralph's Plumbing and Fine Jewelry storefront showing toilets and diamonds illustrating confusing business mix.
Image created with ChatGPT.

Rambling Descriptions

We’ve all heard the importance of a snappy answer to the question, “So what do you do?”

It is possible to have a ridiculous combination but describe it concisely. “We cater birthday parties and fumigate for termites.”

You can explain it in a sentence, sure, but people immediately wonder what you’re smoking.

Other times, the combination isn’t so obviously out of whack, but the offerings have drifted to the point where they’re hard to describe. You find yourself walking people through how everything connects instead of just saying what you do.

“Well, we started as roofers, but we also do some tree trimming if the branches are near the roof, and we can clean your gutters or install new ones, and sometimes we help people with attic ventilation issues, and we’ve done a few deck repairs when it made sense…”

Rambling descriptions are a sign that things have become unfocused and confusing.

Beware Mixed Messages

Of course there are mixed messages out there. For everyone who says “you’ve got to be laser-focused” there’s someone else who says, “I want to hire one person to do these five things for me.”

On Upwork, for example, I see people looking to hire one person who can edit, proofread, create the table of contents, design the cover, format the book for Kindle, and help with marketing.

Sure all these are related to making a book, but that’s a lot of unrelated skills. Clearly somebody wants a generalist. It might make you wonder if it’s worth branching out.

I say to that, look closer at who’s asking. Budget buyers who want a Swiss Army knife worker aren’t the same market as clients who value expertise and will pay for it.

The same goes for physical stores or businesses. If a couple people every now and then come in asking for something unrelated to your core business, it’s not worth muddying the waters to please them.

Ignore the Advice to Combine Things

You may have well-meaning friends or family who tell you to combine your interests or skills. You love BBQ! You love ice cream! Why not do both?

The fact that you personally enjoy or are good at two things doesn’t mean they form a coherent business offering.

This advice is dangerous because when it comes from supportive people you know well, who may have also given you useful help or good other ideas in the past, it’s harder to ignore.

Bottom Line

Though there’s no exact formula for the right level of specialization, you don’t have to guess blindly.

1. If you’re thinking about adding something, consider whether it’s creates value, or creates a distraction.

2. If you can explain what you do but the combination consistently makes people question your sanity, it’s time to reevaluate.

3. If you struggle to explain what you do, you’ve probably drifted too far.

4. If you’re feeling pressure from budget buyers, occasional inquiries, or well-meaning non-business people to become something you’re not, ignore them and focus on your core business.

If you found this useful and want to work together—or just have a question or comment—here’s how to reach me.

AI Video Tools: Why Your Ad Takes More Than Prompts

AI Video Tools: Why Your Ad Takes More Than Just Prompts

Though it’s easy to become numb to seeing AI videos, generating them yourself can seem a bit magical. You enter a short prompt and boom! A minute later you get a video of aliens playing basketball on Venus.

Misunderstood Mechanics of AI Videos

Current video models can make clips that even a few years ago would have cost thousands to film. They can produce animations that would have required years of training and a lot of skill and patience from a human animator.

This apparent easy firehose supply of any video one can imagine creates a potential trap for business owners. They’ll see an AI ad and think, “Hey that looks good!” Then they’ll use Veo or Sora for a few minutes and be like, “Look at this talking gorilla I’ve made. It only took me thirty seconds!”

But the ad isn’t finished. It’s just an 8-second clip or a collection of clips. So they’ll call in an employee and say, “Here’s an easy job for you. Just finish this AI ad. I’ve already done the hard part. Finishing it should only take you an hour.”

The employee goes away, then eventually comes back, with an ad nobody is happy with. It took way longer than expected, doesn’t match the business owner’s vision, and it wasn’t easy for the worker to make after all.

What went wrong?

AI Makes Clips, Not Finished Videos

To understand this, it’s good to lay out the parts that go into a finished video. These are:

1. The footage. This can come from AI generations, or it can be filmed on a camera, or it can be created by an animator.

2. The audio. This can also come from AI or be produced traditionally.

3. Editing. Currently this is still a human task. You can’t go to Veo and say, “Put these five clips together, use this audio, trim this, adjust that.” We’ll probably get there some day, but not today.

4. Scripting, inspiration, matters of taste. Though ChatGPT can write prompts that the video AI uses, ultimately some person has to give direction for what should be in the video, regardless of how the prompts are created.

It’s easy for people to focus on how quickly AI can spit out a short clip, and dismiss all the human factors that still go into making a proper video out of what the AI has generated.

On top of this, as anyone who has used Veo or another video model knows, using AI is no guarantee of getting the clip you want. There’s still a lot of troubleshooting and experimenting involved, particularly if you want something specific or with character continuity. (I wrote more about one common frustration here.)

To make a good AI ad still requires a lot of work, skill, and judgement calls by a person. Yes, it cut out the need for the film crew or animator, but that’s only one part of a video.

Get Ads That Work

Want an AI video up and running? Writing, generating, and editing all contribute to the finished product. I’ve done all these steps, know how they work together, and can handle the whole thing for you, or just help with the parts that aren’t working.

Check out my AI Wrangler page for more, see examples of finished ads, or contact me to discuss your project. I work with businesses directly and white-label with marketing agencies.

Will Using AI For Content Hurt Your Business?

Will Using AI For Content Hurt Your Business?

Forget robot uprisings and super-intelligent AI overlords. A more practical concern is, “Will using AI lose me money?” Plus the related question, “Will NOT using it lose me money?”

A relentless tide of low-effort AI slop content is rising. Millions of people stand to profit by pushing you onto the AI hype train. On the other side are just as many “experts” issuing dire warnings of doom, and internet dwellers getting anti-AI opinions off their chests.

When doing something and doing nothing both seem like mistakes, what is the path forward?

Time to put philosophy and feelings aside. What are the reasons to not use AI in your business?

Reason #1: You obviously don’t need AI

This one is simple. For example, you make pottery by hand and are already selling everything you want, making all the money you care to have. Your system is working, and there’s no reason to introduce AI at this time.

Reason #2: You’re concerned about making people mad

It’s quite common to hear internet people complain about AI art and other content. They say it’s cheap, cringe, steals work from starving artists, puts writers out of a job, and the least a business can do is employ a real person instead of pressing the “easy” button.

But the question isn’t whether some complainers don’t like AI use. The question to ask yourself is whether a lot of these people who oppose AI are your customers, who open up wallets periodically and give you money?

If yes, and using it could alienate them without much prospect of a greater return from somewhere else, AI might not be worth using right now.

If such people are not a big part of your customer base, though, don’t worry about them. They aren’t paying you anyway.

Reason #3: You’re concerned AI slop will make you look cheap

Putting aside the people who specifically don’t like AI, what about the more general public? These are people who don’t have philosophical opinions about the technology but are becoming sick of the AI slop being shoved in their faces every day.

In this case, the important question to ask yourself is whether the AI writing, images, or videos you are putting out qualifies as “slop.” Or is it useful to your customers?

If you run a carpet cleaning company and somebody just spilled marinara sauce on his white carpet, two days before the in-laws come to visit, do you think he cares if you used AI in your business? He cares how quickly you can clean the rug. 

Today, people don’t like AI slop, but they’re revolting against SLOP. They aren’t revolting against something helpful, interesting, useful, or entertaining that’s making their lives better or easier.

If your AI use or content provides value that in any way positively impacts the lives of people who experience it, the vast majority will not care that AI was involved. They will care about whatever pain you took away or helpful service you provided.

Flowchart for deciding when to use AI in business with decisions and outcomes

Get The Benefits Without the Hassle

Want some AI propellant without needing to wade through all the options yourself? Though I started writing when the current AI chips were still silica sand, I’ve also kept up to date on AI tools, allowing me to help based on practical experience.

Contact me and you can tune what you get, from pure human writing, to AI videos and research, or somewhere in between. I work with businesses directly and white-label with marketing agencies.

 

Upwork Client Behavior Explained

Upwork Client Behavior Explained

Chalk and chalkboard with math equation "1 + 1 = 3" representing confusing Upwork client behavior.

If you’re a freelancer working on Upwork, client behavior can seem erratic and unknowable. You can’t come out and ask, “Why do you want me to rush but you were slow? Why are you so cheap but expecting good quality work? Why are you disorganized?”

As I’ve mentioned elsewhere, I not only work on Upwork myself, but I’ve hired dozens of people and read hundreds of proposals. I’ve been in the freelancer’s shoes but also seen what it’s like to post a job, work on a hiring team for a company, and be a client.

So now you don’t have to ask those reasonable but abrasive questions! I’ll answer them, to help give a better understanding of why Upwork clients act the way they do.

The Simplest Explanation First

Some people are lazy, cheap, disorganized, inarticulate, and antagonistic. This explanation for client behavior can pretty much apply to any source of friction you encounter. That’s why I’m putting it here at the top.

For the rest of this list, I’m going to focus on explanations that are less obvious.

You Are Invited to Jobs That Don’t Match Your Listed Skills

Wrench hovering over a screw representing mismatched Upwork job invitations.
Image created with ChatGPT

When someone posts a job, Upwork automatically generates a list of workers to invite. It’s easy to click on those names without taking into account who is actually suited for the job.

Another reason you might be invited for something that isn’t a good match is that Upwork sometimes assigns its own employees, called “Talent Specialists”, to help busy client accounts find workers.

If the client just wants extra options, or if not many people are naturally proposing on a job, a Talent Specialist may invite you. The actual client may not have even seen your profile yet, so don’t read too much into the invitation.

Vague Job Posts and Instructions

Head silhouette with tangled arrows pointing in multiple directions representing confused thinking.

Because detailed job posts and precise instructions increase the likelihood of the project being completed successfully, these things are in the client’s own best interest. But many times they are vague. What can explain this?

Some people know they need a certain task completed, but don’t know what they want beyond that, or any of the technical details involved. They are the equivalent of somebody who knows it’s time for a haircut, but when the barber asks “What are you looking for?” have nothing meaningful to say.

Another reason for vague posts and instructions is that Upwork client accounts can be divided into “sub-admin” accounts, which are secondary users who have been given partial access to a main account.

From the freelancer’s perspective, you just see a job post and that the client has hired 512 people in the past, and has reviews for many previous jobs. This is because all activity under the main account is pooled together, and could have been done by 20 different people with sub-admin accounts.

So, even though it might appear you are communicating with a big company, it’s possible that the person you are actually dealing with is a middle manager, who was assigned to make a job post without being given adequate instructions. This person may even be another Upwork freelancer, and not an employee of the company.

In a situation like this, your middle-manager “client” probably does not have all the necessary information about the job, and may need to ask his client (the company) for clarifications to your questions. This person may also not have authority to approve your work when it is submitted.

All this stacks together to create slow responses and vague or contradictory instructions.

Low Pay

Person with empty pocket holding a few coins in open palm.

Some people have unrealistic expectations out of ignorance. They think, “Hey I’m not doing this myself, but it should be easy. I could do it in five minutes. But I’m so busy I’ll hire someone else.”

This can lead to lower pay because with little understanding of what your work actually involves, and overestimating their own ability to do your job, they figure it will only take you a few minutes. They think the very low pay is actually fair and even generous, given that they “know” your work will be quick and easy.

The Client is Slow to Respond

Skeleton slumped over laptop on cluttered desk with crumpled paper and books.

There are a couple of common reasons for this:

They’re waiting on someone else. As mentioned above, the person you’re talking to might be a middle manager who needs to get clarification from somebody else before being able to answer you.

They’re overwhelmed. People who hire a lot on Upwork have many chats going. This can lead to so many messages that things get lost. As a good worker, losing track of a chat seems unthinkable, but it’s much easier to do as a client.

No Review from Client of Your Work

Freelancer working alone in darkness waiting for Upwork client review.

It’s good to keep in mind that we workers know how extremely valuable reviews are, but clients may not. They just want you to fix their problem, and then as far as they’re concerned, the job is over. They don’t know that good reviews are gold to you.

Beyond that, here are some more specific reasons for not getting a review:

  1. The client was unhappy with how the job has gone, but is the type of person who would rather passively disengage, than spend time on a review and then possibly have to deal with your reply to that review.

  2. Reviews are just too low a priority for the client to bother.

  3. The client isn’t sure how to end the contract or leave one.

Old Contracts Left Open

Abandoned rusty car in desert field with tall grass.

Your client may not know how to use the sometimes-confusing Upwork website, or they simply forget to close out the contract. Simple as that.

Want Personalized Feedback?

Want to know why clients aren’t responding to your particular proposals? As someone who’s reviewed hundreds of Upwork applications while hiring over 60 freelancers, I can audit your profile and proposals from a client’s perspective, showing you what’s working and what’s costing you jobs.

Contact me for personalized feedback. I’m happy to have a quick call or talk through email at no cost; start paying me only if we end up working together. This way you see how I can help you specifically, and I’ll have a better understanding of your needs from the start.

After You’re Hired on Upwork: Increase Your Odds of Repeat Clients

After You’re Hired on Upwork: Increase Your Odds of Repeat Clients

Golden egg among white eggs, representing standing out from the competition to get repeat clients on Upwork.

Getting hired on Upwork can be tough. Even if you do everything right, it’s definitely a buyer’s market.

But if you stick with it you’ll get hired. Hardest part over, right?

Well, once that happens, which sounds better: A one-off job for the client and then back to grinding out more proposals? Or an ongoing relationship with the client, where you get offered work again and again, without having to scrounge the job feed?

The second option sure sounds better to me!

This post is about the things you can do to make working with you more pleasant for clients, so when they need more work done, they look forward to hiring you again.  

By the way, I’m not talking about your quality of work or how much money you ask for. Of course that matters. You don’t need to read this to know that good-quality work at a reasonable cost is going to please the average client more than bad, expensive work.

Instead, I want to talk about things that will make you stand out over your competition and that are independent of work quality and money. They are behaviors that have a lot of impact but most people don’t bother doing.

These tips come from two sources: My own experience reviewing hundreds of Upwork proposals while hiring and working with 60+ freelancers, and views expressed by someone I know who himself has hired hundreds of freelancers on Upwork.

1. Speed Is a Premium Resource

Black and white photo of sprinters at the start of a race.

Does this mean it’s best to go as fast as possible under all circumstances? No.

If you’ve been hired to write a 5,000 word article in two weeks, turning in your work after a day would probably raise eyebrows, rather than impress. It would be like, “Was this just written with AI? How good can the quality be? I need it in two weeks, not today.”

Insane rushing is not needed to impress here. However, it would definitely look good to turn in your work a day or two earlier than the deadline.

Where speed really makes a difference is for small tasks, particularly ones that involve a lot of back and forth with the client. For example, I’ve worked with about ten different graphic designers to create YouTube thumbnails. The edits for these jobs are often very small. They’ll be things like moving text over a little on the image, or making an element larger.

For these very small tasks, if I have to wait 24-36 hours for each iteration, the days it takes to complete a thumbnail really adds up. But if the graphic designer makes these small changes the same day, it can greatly speed up the whole process.

If you’re in a field where clients ask for many small changes, and they’re the type of things you can do quickly on your end without lowering quality, cutting down the iteration time on those changes makes you stand out.

2. Deliver Work When You Say You Will

White delivery van with "Delivery Always On Time" written on the side.

Having actions match words seems pretty basic, but I’ve seen people fail at this so many times, it’s worth mentioning. A freelancer will say, “I’ll get this to you on Tuesday” and then deliver it on Friday.

Even though speed is a premium resource, it’s MUCH better to say something will take a longer amount of time and be on time for that, than to give a faster time and then be late. In the first case, you’re reliable, whatever your pace. Being reliable will make you stand out, because so many people are not.

3. No Excuses

Steaming pile of manure in a field symbolizing excuses that don't fly with clients.

Anyone who has hired or managed other people has heard a lot of excuses already:

  • “The traffic was bad.”
  • “I was sick.”
  • “My dog was sick.”
  • “I’m moving, and things are crazy right now.”
  • “My grandmother recently passed.”
  • “There was flooding in my village.”

From the client’s perspective, maybe you’re telling the truth, and maybe you’re lying. In either case, how do your words help anything? The client is still waiting for the work to be delivered.

For minor mistakes or delays, it’s better to just apologize and not offer an excuse unless directly asked what happened.

For more major delays or problems, an honest explanation can be helpful, as it would be odd not to fully acknowledge the situation. But you’re probably better off saying things like “personal obligations” or “medical issues” rather than going into detail.

4. Proactively Keep Your Client Up to Date

Person blowing an animal horn at a waterfall representing proactive client communication.

I’ve worked with a lot of people who go silent unless I follow up. Then they say, “I was just about to start working on it today” or “My grandmother just passed” or “I’ll get it done by tomorrow” (and then not get it done).

If you’re a freelancer, making the client be the one to reach out forces your client to do extra work, and to deal with the mental load of sending you a message. Many people don’t want to sound like nags, which puts them in an uncomfortable position when they have to check in asking for work progress, not sure how polite or direct they need to be to get their message across.

On top of this, many people who hire are managing more than one project at a time, which means you may be the fifth person they had to check in on today.

You can stand out by taking away this burden from your client. If it’s been a while since your last message and everything is going well, it’s good to say that. If there are issues, better to just say that now, instead of waiting to be asked about them. Even a very short message can accomplish a lot.

Another good option is to agree with your client up front about what reporting frequency will work for a given project, and then stick to that schedule.

5. Don’t Max Out Your Billable Hours Every Week

Heaping pile of potato chips.
Piling up as many hours of work as possible can be tempting, but it can backfire.

Sometimes the work clearly justifies using all your billable hours, and that’s fine. But if the amount of work you’re given varies from week to week, and you consistently bill your maximum hours, this gets noticed. You might not get called out for it, but when people need to be cut, your name is more likely to come up.

I’d go so far as to say it’s worth purposefully working less sometimes, or billing less even if you do the same amount of work, to make sure you don’t develop a reputation as a money sponge.

Want Feedback Tailored to You?

Tailor's hands cutting black fabric with scissors.

Following these tips will help you stand out from your competition, and you can start doing them today.

If you want to know how your Upwork profile, proposals, or portfolio look from a client’s perspective—and what might be holding you back—I can give you personalized feedback. Contact me to have a chat about your situation.

Is ChatGPT Worth Subscribing To?

Is ChatGPT Worth Subscribing To?

You may be thinking about using ChatGPT to help write pages for your website or do research. This review is intended to help answer whether ChatGPT is worth your time and money.

I have used ChatGPT on and off since 2023. I have also used Claude, Grok, Gemini, and others, so I have some frame of reference for what else is out there. I’m not affiliated with any of these companies.

Are you a business owner who’d rather get the benefits of AI tools like ChatGPT without having to figure them all out? I can handle that for you.

Is ChatGPT Better Than Other LLMs?

For basic queries and information gathering, the free versions of ChatGPT, Grok, and Claude are pretty similar. (I’ve mainly used Gemini with a paid Ultra plan, so I can’t speak to how that stacks up to free versions.) There’s no particular reason to use ChatGPT over the others, or to avoid it. The choice more comes down to personal preferences, as each chat has a slightly different personality, and whether you like or dislike one of the companies.

Why Subscribe?

In my experience, the main reason to subscribe is to increase the daily usage limit for the GPT-5 model. Currently the free plan gives you 10 messages per five-hour time period, and three file uploads.

I’ve found this is often enough for casual use, particularly when I’m subscribed for a different LLM and use its higher limits.

The quality of the responses goes down noticeably when the system switches from GPT-5. There are some times when I’ve found it’s worth a Plus subscription, which is $19.99 per month, to get a higher number of GPT-5 responses. 

Writing Ability

Not having to write it yourself is a big selling point of ChatGPT and AIs in general. ChatGPT’s writing style has gotten better since I wrote about it. But it still writes like an AI, whether the average reader consciously notices that or not.

I certainly wouldn’t recommend relying on ChatGPT (or any other AI) to write something and then use it verbatim. Where ChatGPT can be helpful is in creating rough drafts, particularly for subjects you have no inspiration about or experience in. This way, at least you have something to edit, revise, and build from, instead of working from a blank page.

The other way it can be helpful is at the end of the process: catching typos, pointing out sentences that might be confusing, and offering ideas for additions and subtractions.

Beyond this, writing is a solitary process, and finding a responsive reader has historically been a big challenge for writers. ChatGPT has faults, but so do people. Even considering all its quirks, as an on-call second opinion, it provides a genuinely valuable service.

If you want to subscribe mainly for writing, though, instead of ChatGPT I recommend using Claude. It’s a similar price, but its writing is more human. ChatGPT uses a lot of em dashes, colons, bulleted lists with bold headers, and sentences saying “whether you’re…” and “from…to…” It also overuses words like showcase, key, ensure, and feature.

Claude does some of this also, but less overall, which helps cut down on editing later.

Research Ability

Besides whatever datasets they were trained on, ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok all have access to the internet for research. So unlike a couple years ago where ChatGPT’s knowledge was clearly cut off at a certain date, it can now help with researching current topics by searching online.

For basic questions, I’ve found that ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok will all give answers of about equal usefulness.

I’ve noticed, though, that each of them will often find different sources. So, for example, when I was researching the history of the electric motor, while no AI was obviously flatly better than the other, they worked well together. Each had a slightly different perspective. If they all agree on something, there’s a higher probability it’s correct; but if one disagrees, that’s useful to know as well.

Even if ChatGPT isn’t your main AI, it’s worth using to double or triple check work created elsewhere.

Picture Generation

This has never been a main use of mine, though periodically I’ve experimented with images for one reason or another. When I started in 2023, it was still common for hands to be distorted, and it had a lot of trouble generating text.

I don’t have saved examples of the old ugly pictures, but picture generation has come a long way since then. Here are some examples of what it looks like now:

A ChatGPT-created image of a woman with dark hair holding up her hand with each finger visible.
Prompt: Create an image of a woman holding up her hand, so we see her palm with each finger visible.
A ChatGPT-created image of red capitalized letters within a red boarder on a tan background, saying "I'm doing my part!"
Prompt: Create an image of a banner that says, "I'm doing my part!”
ChatGPT-created image of a golden spaceship with an art-deco design with a planet and stars in the background.
Prompt: Create an image of an art deco space battleship.

These images certainly aren’t perfect. Overall, though, for free or $19.99 per month image generation, it’s amusing if nothing else, and is now good enough to also be potentially useful.

Other Uses

ChatGPT can be helpful answering math questions, if one doesn’t know how to do them, or just doesn’t feel like doing the calculations manually.

For non-work related tasks, I’ve gotten the most use out of it troubleshooting the health of some of my plants. This is a situation where uploading pictures is helpful, because it can see how the plant looks, and then give suggestions.

For things like this, I’ve found it can save time talking to it through the phone, instead of typing on the computer. Its ability to transcribe audio is very good, so it’s easy to talk naturally, and it will comprehend what you say.

Bias, Politics, and Privacy

If you’ve followed AI news at all, you’ve probably heard about various controversies involving OpenAI and ChatGPT. And you may wonder about its bias and have concerns about your privacy. I can’t put any of those concerns to rest. This review is simply looking at its potential usefulness as a productivity tool.

Price & Value

Though there are higher tiers, I’ve only subscribed to the Plus plan, which is $19.99 per month. This price is in line with the basic plans of other similar AIs.

One thing ChatGPT does very well is make it extremely easy to subscribe and unsubscribe. There are no confusing user interfaces or convoluted actions needed to make it happen. Whether you’re subscribing or unsubscribing, it only takes a couple button clicks.

Bottom Line

Unlike my reviews of ElevenLabs and CapCut, ChatGPT does not have a long and granular issues list from a user standpoint.

Is it worth using for free? Yes, for research, kicking ideas around, answering basic questions, doing math. It can be useful by itself or as a second opinion to complement another AI.

Is it worth subscribing to? That really depends on your usage:

  • If you’re going to ask only a few questions a day, don’t bother subscribing, use the free plan.
  • If you mainly want to use AI for writing, subscribe to Claude instead, which is a similar price but the writing is better.
  • If you have many questions and want to show many photos to ChatGPT per day, it can be worth getting a subscription.

It’s not a panacea for writing or anything else, and has plenty of limitations. But as a tool in your toolbox, it can be helpful.

If you’re a business owner who wants AI working for your business without sorting through all the tools and subscriptions yourself, here’s how I help and here’s how to reach me.

CapCut Review: Is It Worth Subscribing to for Video Editing?

CapCut Review: Is It Worth Subscribing to for Video Editing?

This summer a client asked me to experiment making AI videos. Without getting into the weeds on AI video generation, the thing to know is that AI doesn’t currently create long videos with many scene transitions. Instead, they typically make short, single-scene clips (known as “outputs”). Google’s Veo, which I’ve used the most, currently makes outputs 8 seconds long.

Because of this, for videos longer than the output length, the AI video still has to be edited together by a human.

My client needed a longer video, so I decided to try CapCut. My review is from the perspective of someone looking for specific results in a few areas, and is not influenced by any affiliate deals or connections to CapCut.

Are you a business owner or marketing professional who could use AI-generated video ads without the hassle of learning the tools yourself? That’s a service I offer. See examples of what I’ve made, or get in touch if you want to talk about it.

CapCut Version Comparison

Mobile

For iOS and Android.

Available Subscription Tiers

  • Free: Basic editing with a watermark.
  • Pro: Removes watermark and unlocks all premium features.

Desktop

For Windows and macOS.

Available Subscription Tiers

  • Free: Basic editing with a watermark.
  • Pro: Removes watermark and unlocks all premium features.

Online

Accessible in a browser.

Available Subscription Tiers

  • Free: Basic editing with a watermark.
  • Pro: Removes watermark and unlocks premium features.
  • Business: All Pro features plus team collaboration tools and commercial assets.

I’ve used free CapCut Online, and CapCut Desktop with a Pro subscription. They are similar, but different enough to be worth covering (mostly) separately.

CapCut Online

CapCut Online interface showing new project workspace with uploaded video files in left sidebar and empty timeline for video editing.
New project screen with my videos on the left and empty workspace on the right.

Online is the simplest version. Very basic tasks are fairly intuitive to do. It can be used for free or with a subscription that unlocks extra features. It’s easy to get started quickly and is, for the most part, straightforward to use. I barely watched or read instructions and was able to cut and assemble videos and move around text and audio elements to make functional videos.

Free CapCut Online works fine for a 30-second or minute-long video that doesn’t have many tracks (more on this later) or elements beyond the video segments themselves and audio.

I would not, however, recommend it for anything even mildly complex, because it lacks some important features that are in CapCut Desktop. For example, audio elements are more clunky to adjust, and it only allows eight tracks to be stacked in the timeline. I’ve never hit a track limit with CapCut Desktop.

In case you’re wondering, the “timeline” is where you assemble a video.

CapCut Online timeline view showing assembled video clips with audio tracks and text elements in a 25-second video project.

“Tracks” hold individual elements like video segments, pictures, text, filters, audio, and so forth, that contribute to the finished video. They can build up quickly, so eight is not a lot.

CapCut for Desktop (with a “Pro” subscription)

CapCut Desktop Pro interface showing empty new project workspace with import area, editing tools, and project settings panel.
Empty new project screen for desktop. Most of the same buttons are here as in the online version, but everything is darker and moved around.

CapCut Desktop is less clunky and more versatile in every way than the online version. There are quality of life additions like clickable sliders for easily controlling sound volume on the tracks, and it has more keyframing options. (Keyframes are used to mark the beginning and end of transitions and transformations. For example, if you want a video to slowly zoom out, this would be marked with a keyframe starting at a high level of zoom, and ending with a lower level. The video would then smoothly transition between those two values as it plays.)

Both Online and Desktop automatically save projects whenever the user clicks out of them. There is no separate save button. In many ways, this is convenient. But it does mean that if the video gets messed up for whatever reason and you don’t remember to revert the changes before exiting, you’re stuck with them. There’s no way to cancel out and just load a fresh save.

With Desktop it’s possible to get around this by duplicating a project and keeping one version as the backup save. CapCut Online does not appear to support duplicating a project, so if your one version of the video is corrupted, there’s no backup.

The saving factor aside, it’s common to need different variants of the same video, which is harder to do with Online, but easy with Desktop.

All other factors aside, the ability to duplicate a project makes it worth using Desktop instead of Online.

CapCut Issues

The short version of this section is CapCut has many small and medium-sized annoyances. Here’s the long version:

1. Although a Pro subscription covers both Online and Desktop, there’s no way to transfer a project from the Online space to the Desktop space. This can be a pain if you’ve maxed out what Online can do and have a half-finished project that you want to finish with Desktop. Instead of being able to transfer the project, you have to make it again. I just don’t start anything with CapCut Online anymore.

2. The system for renewing the Pro subscription is horrible. Here’s what happened: I didn’t know how long I would be using CapCut, so it wasn’t set to auto-renew. When it ran out, I needed to resubscribe to continue work on a video. There was a popup prompting resubscription; I followed it, and paid. However it didn’t then just renew Pro, but continued prompting for resubscription again (this time offering a discount). It took about half an hour to figure out how to sign back in so that the Pro subscription would work, but even now, I’m unclear of the correct way to do it again.

3. There are popup screens prompting updates when the system is already up to date.

CapCut update notification dialog displaying confusing prompt to update from current version 6.9.0 to same version 6.9.0.

4. When a video gets complicated, if you change something at the beginning, like trimming or extending a clip, it will often desynchronize everything in the timeline that comes later. If a video has text, filters, and separate audio, the number of things that need to be resynchronized for each change adds up quickly. Trimming three seconds at the beginning may require adjusting 25 elements that are now out of position.

CapCut Desktop editing timeline displaying dense multi-track video project with numerous video segments, audio tracks, and text overlays spanning multiple minutes.

This is no big deal for a 30 second video with a few elements. But it can quickly become unmanageable for longer videos. There is, theoretically, a way to drag and drop many elements at once, modify the beginning of the timeline, and then move the block of elements back. However, even for a video less than three minutes long, I found this nearly froze my computer (which isn’t from the 1990s).

It may look like I had a lot going on in that screenshot, but it was still a relatively simple video. There is no user-friendly way to isolate the beginning and modify it while keeping everything else together.

Based on this issue, I would not use CapCut for anything over 5 minutes long, unless it has very few elements. Instead I’d learn a more robust video editor like DaVinci Resolve or Adobe Premiere Pro.

Price & Value

The monthly Pro subscription currently costs $19.99. Overall, this is reasonable for the value. Pro unlocks many extra features that are useful, or at least interesting to experiment with.

For putting together a couple simple videos, it isn’t worth it, but for any sort of consistent use or complex editing, I’d get Pro.

What happens if you get it, make projects, and then cancel your subscription? Your videos will still be in your account. But anything you made using a Pro-level feature can’t be downloaded again until you resubscribe.

Bottom Line

For someone who isn’t starting with a knowledge base, isn’t interested in filmmaking, and wants to make simple videos fast, CapCut is a useful tool.

If you’re making more than a few videos, it’s worth downloading for desktop and getting a Pro subscription.

The subscription renewal can be a pain and there are some quality of life issues that arise once videos get even moderately complex.

But as a beginner’s program that isn’t too complicated, expensive, or hard to learn, it gets the job done.

If you’re a business owner who needs video content but doesn’t want to deal with learning editors like CapCut, I create video ads for clients from start to finish. See examples or get in touch.

Is ElevenLabs Worth Subscribing To? A User’s Review

Is ElevenLabs Worth Subscribing To? A User’s Review

Looking for an AI generated audio service with text-to-speech and sound effects? Wondering if ElevenLabs is worth the time and money?

This review is not meant to be an exhaustive listing of every feature and how it compares to every other audio AI out there.

Over the last year I’ve subscribed to ElevenLabs several times for different client projects. Here are my impressions as an actual user who needed the product to work for specific tasks. I am not affiliated with ElevenLabs in any way.

The client projects I’ve used ElevenLabs for include creating video ads for businesses. If you’re a business owner or marketer who could use video ads without learning all these tools yourself, see what I’ve produced or get in touch.

Text to Speech

I have the most experience with the “Instant Speech” generator, used for speech chunks of 3,000 characters or less.

The ElevenLabs user dashboard, with a red arrow pointing to the "Instant speech" feature for text-to-speech generation.

There is a large selection of pre-made voices. While some are better than others, and some sound more obviously AI than others, overall there is a lot to work with here.

For the most part, the voices pronounce words correctly and add emphasis or pauses that sound natural. They are way beyond the horrible text to speech of the past.

When you select a voice to generate speech, it will generate two outputs at a time, each with a little variation between them (there’s no way to change this number). Occasionally, one output is perfect on the first attempt, but I found that this is rare. When I want precise emphasis or cadence, even for short paragraphs, it often takes five or ten tries to get something I’m happy with.

Issues with Text to Speech

1. It often cuts the last word short. It doesn’t actually cut it off, but the clip will end on the last sound of the last word in a way that sounds terse and unnatural. It’s not easy to hear this while generating outputs, though, but usually becomes obvious later when assembling a video and listening to the audio in context. I like to include a filler sentence that can be cut out later, but provides a buffer for the parts I want to make sure are not cut off. A short sentence works better than just one word, because one (or two) random words are often not read aloud when placed after a regular sentence. 

2. The voices can vary too much between outputs. The variation is a problem because sometimes the same voice can sound like different people. Here’s “Liam” reading the same two words: First take. Second Take. This can cause a lot of extra work trying to match outputs from different prompts.

There’s a slider to help control the variability, which can make the outputs a bit more consistent with the tradeoff of sounding potentially more robotic. This is better than nothing, but ultimately, it’s not a good choice between an inconsistent voice and a robotic one.

There is the ability to insert words in brackets to better indicate how the text should be read. This is somewhat helpful. For instance, here’s a line where I told it to [laugh] at the end. But the system sometimes just reads the words in the brackets out loud, like in this recording where I put an [anxious] direction at the beginning to set the tone.

3. Occasionally there will be background noises or sound effects that can ruin otherwise good outputs. This isn’t too common, though. If I like the output itself, I isolate the voice later using CapCut, which is a simple editing program. (I’ll have a review of it soon.)

4. The user interface to select voices is convoluted. If you’ve used ElevenLabs and have been confused by this part, it’s not just you.

How it should be: Select a voice and press a button to use that voice.

How it is: Find a voice and press a button next to “Select a voice” but the button takes you back to the previous page. That’s because you need to add the voice to your “voice library” in order to select it. But if your library is full (10 voices on the Starter plan) it won’t let you add the voice. So you now have to leave the page and navigate to the voice library, to delete one of the saved voices and free up more room. But this takes you away from the voice you’ve found, so now you have to navigate back to the voice options and find it again to add to the library.

On top of this, the catalogue of voices is cut up into different sections, and it’s unclear if there’s a way to search all the voices at once.

Using the “Studio” Text to Speech to Create Audio Books

Generating audio in the ElevenLabs editor, where a user can input text, organize it by chapters, and select from a list of available AI voices to create the speech.

The Studio interface allows generated content to be organized in chapters, and is generally better at handling large amounts of text than Instant Speech. I used Studio when a client asked if I could make some audiobooks.

The same voices are available as in Instant Speech, and from a usability standpoint, Studio is relatively easy and straightforward. There are plenty of options to fine-tune the reading, though my client didn’t want me spending a bunch of time on that; I mainly went with the default output.

Issues with Studio Text to Speech

It can struggle with punctuation and pauses. I spent a while in trial and error, adding and removing paragraph breaks and ellipses, to get it to read chapter headings correctly before the body text.

The default reading is more robotic than with Instant Speech for the same voices. Overall, there are fewer quality-of-life issues here, though.

Sound Effects

I’ve found the sound effects generator to be a very useful feature for adding background audio to videos. Things like far-off bird sounds, breathing, electrical shorts, air-conditioner hum, and suburban backyards. When a prompt is entered, the system automatically generates four outputs. I haven’t found a way to change this number. It is possible, though, to select the output duration from 0.5 seconds to 22 seconds.

For short clips of basic sounds, I found the outputs to be quite good. Sometimes I had to tweak my prompts and generate multiple batches, but I rarely went away without something I could use.

Issues with Sound Effects

It’s not uncommon for one of the outputs to be silent or very faint. The system also has a hard time with abstract prompts like “transcended enlightenment.”

Probably the worst thing about Sound Effects is that there’s no clear way to delete the output history. This is a problem because if I need to try five times to get the right bird sounds, now the history is forever clogged up with 20 outputs, and it becomes harder and harder to find old but good outputs as time goes on.

There is, apparently, some method to delete the history using API access, though I haven’t attempted it.

Other Features

ElevenLabs has multiple features beyond text to speech and sound effects: voice changer, voice isolator, voice clone, music generator, dubbing, speech to text, and some others. As of writing this, I haven’t used these enough to review them.

Price & Value

ElevenLabs pricing and subscription plans, detailing cost per month for Starter, Creator, Pro, and Scale tiers, including features and text-to-speech credit limits.

ElevenLabs has multiple pricing tiers, with monthly and yearly subscription options. I have used the “Starter” plan at $5 per month and the “Creator” plan at $22 per month. The higher-priced plan gives more of everything and a few options not included in the lower plans.

When I needed to make short voiceovers and some sound effects, the $5 Starter plan was genuinely useful.

I used the Creator plan when making the audiobooks. It’s definitely necessary to have a higher plan like this, if you want to narrate multiple thousands of words. While I did run out of credits pretty quickly making audiobooks, I think the Creator plan is a reasonable value for the price.

One thing about ElevenLabs that’s great compared to some AI subscriptions is that it’s fast and easy to unsubscribe whenever you want.

Bottom Line

Even when I am only using a few of the available features, ElevenLabs gives good value for the money. There are some pretty annoying user interface issues, but they don’t outweigh all the quality features.

Overall, ElevenLabs is a useful service and definitely above average in the AI ecosystem.

ElevenLabs is one of several AI tools I use to create video ads for businesses. If you’d rather have someone handle the tools and deliver the finished product, here’s my work and here’s how to reach me.

Does a Business Blog Make Sense Today?

Does a Business Blog Make Sense Today?

Twenty years ago, conventional wisdom said if you had a business and a website, you needed to blog. It would bring in traffic through Yahoo and let customers “get to know you.”

Today, most businesses have blogs. They can seem like obligatory white noise, they have no novelty, and there’s a ton of competition.

What reasons could possibly justify writing a blog to help promote your business today?

Good reasons for a blog:

  • You naturally have something to say that relates to your expertise, product, or service.
  • You have industry insights that genuinely help your readers.
  • It’s part of a well-thought-out plan, with a clear goal and the ability to measure progress.
  • You enjoy writing.
  • It helps answer questions customers ask you repeatedly.

If you meet at least some of these points, then a blog could be worth the effort. Research analyzing 912 million blog posts found that longer, more comprehensive content significantly outperforms shorter posts in both social shares and backlinks, suggesting that readers and other sites recognize and reward substantial, helpful content.

Though there are millions of blogs already, that doesn’t matter in your specific case, any more than millions of books existing should stop an author with something to say from writing a new book.

Bad reasons for a blog:

  • “Everyone else has done it.” Yes, just about everyone has. So having one, in itself, doesn’t help much.
  • “AI will write everything.”
  • Just doing it for SEO purposes without any real plan, passion, or consistency.
  • Absolutely no interest in writing the blog, not even enough to delegate to someone else.
  • Copying what competitors do without understanding why they do it.
  • Thinking any content is better than no content.

The world really does have enough of these types of blogs already.

The hidden costs of a bad blog

Typos and poor formatting are a pretty regular part of bad blog posts, as they’re typically slapped together by someone who’d rather be doing something else. This sends an unprofessional message to customers because bad writing reflects poorly on your overall business quality. According to Backlinko’s analysis of content performance, poor writing quality is one of the factors that leads to higher bounce rates and lower engagement.

Bad blogs also:

  • Waste your time and energy on content nobody reads, and that might not even help your page rankings.
  • Frustrate visitors who come looking for useful information.
  • Create an ongoing maintenance burden.
  • A dead blog with its most recent post from 2022 makes customers wonder if your business is still active.

Bottom Line

Even today, blogs can be valuable, but only when done thoughtfully and with realistic expectations. According to Orbit Media’s research on blogger success factors, the bloggers who report strong results share common traits: they have clear goals, measure their progress, and consistently create content that serves their audience’s needs.

The blogging industry has become extremely saturated, and it’s difficult for business blogs to stand out without genuine effort and strategy.

In case you were wondering, there’s really no such thing as a business that’s too strange, niche, or “boring” to have a blog if it’s done well. If septic tank services, concrete pumping companies, and carpet cleaners can have blogs, your business can too. Provided there’s a need and motivation. 

What’s the most unusual business blog you’ve read?

If you do decide you want a blog, but don’t want to write it all yourself, contact me for painless blog pages that work for your business, written by an actual, experienced human.

Upwork Proposal Tips: Avoid These 5 Costly Mistakes

Upwork Proposal Tips: Avoid These 5 Costly Mistakes

No matter how good you are at your work, if you get rejected because of mistakes in your proposal, no client will know about your skills.

I’ve hired over 50 freelancers on Upwork for a variety of tasks and read hundreds of proposals. I’ve seen great proposals and a lot of rough ones. Here are some things to avoid next time you propose on a job:

1. Long, Generic, AI Proposals

If you won’t write it yourself, how can you expect the client to be bothered to read what’s there? Unless the client has never seen proposals before, AI language isn’t fooling anybody. It isn’t impressive, it’s just more text on a page to wade through. It’s much better to have a short proposal that clearly shows you have read and understood the job post.

(Possible exception: If you use AI to help write your proposal, but you edit it to read like a human wrote it, that can be fine.)

2. Asking for a Raise in the “Schedule a Rate Increase” Feature

If the client has never hired you before, it feels like a risk to commit to a pay increase, before you’ve started working together. Also, people are cheap and just don’t like this. As there are often a lot of workers to choose from, why not go with the person who is NOT asking for a raise before the job even starts? I recommend selecting “never” in the raise menu. You can always ask for a raise later after proving your abilities; it just won’t be automated.

3. Asking for More Than the Listed Job Price

Clients generally put down what they are willing to pay. Asking for more money will put you at the bottom of the list, if not get you rejected without even being looked at.

This might seem obvious, but people ask for more than the stated budget all the time.

If you think a job is underpaid, instead of asking for more money, it’s probably better to just bid on other jobs that pay what you think is right.

4. Not Including Relevant Samples; Confusing File Names

I’ve seen many people propose on voice acting jobs and not send a sample of their voice, and graphic artists not include pictures of their art.

Unless everything that you do can be explained in the cover letter, you must include at least one sample that’s relevant to the job post. Saying “see my portfolio” isn’t good enough either, because now you’re asking the client to search through your profile. Not only is this extra work for potential clients, but there’s no guarantee they’ll find the specific sample you want them to see.

The more specific and relevant to the job post your sample is, the better.

It’s also good to have your samples named in a clear way. For instance, if I was submitting a sample, I might call it “Rozek-Landscaping-Article.pdf” or “Rozek-Editing-Sample.docx.”

When things are named “writing.docx” or “292834892928.jpg” or “demo.mov,” it can easily become lost among samples from other proposals.

5. Ignoring Requests in the Proposal

If the client asks for something specific, like you including a particular word in your proposal, or answering a certain question, then you automatically fail the filtering mechanism if you ignore this. It’s the fastest way to get sorted into the “this person won’t even follow my basic first instruction” group, that’s often used when triaging amongst 30+ proposals. You’ve got to follow these basic specific requests at the beginning. This is another mistake that seems obvious but is frequently made. 

Avoiding these things won’t guarantee you get hired, but it will put you ahead of 80% of your competition.

Which of these surprised you the most? Think I should add any to this list?

P.S.: For broader Upwork strategy, see 15 Useful Tips for Using Upwork.

Do NOT Confuse Veo 3 with Veo3.ai

Do NOT Confuse Veo 3 with Veo3.ai

Update: I’ve revised this post from its original version, to reflect changes to Google’s AI Ultra plan, which increased monthly credits from 12,500 to 25,000 for and made Veo 3 Fast generations free in Flow for Ultra subscribers (changes implemented in August 2025).

If you’re thinking about using Veo 3 to generate videos, or aren’t sure about the economics of credit usage, this post is for you.

Be aware: “Veo 3” the AI video generation model, and “Veo3.ai” the website, are not the same thing. One could cost you a lot more.

“Veo 3” = an AI video creation model made by Google.

“Veo3.ai” = A website NOT affiliated with Google, and may be a scam site based on user reports.

If you’re a business owner or marketer who wants video ads made with Veo without dealing with the confusion around access, pricing, and scam sites, I do this for clients. See examples of what I’ve made or get in touch.

The backstory to this post is that when I started making AI videos for a client, he asked me to use Google’s Veo 3 video creation model. Seems simple, right? But even figuring out how to sign up—and where—was confusing.

The economics were also unclear. There appeared to be ways of generating videos for free, or with credits bought from Google, or through third-party sites running the Veo 3 model, also using credits, but not affiliated with Google.

(Credits = what you can use to pay for a video generation. These aren’t a universal monetary standard, so how much actual money a credit costs, and how much it buys, varies between companies that use credits.)

I was hesitant to sign up for anything without research ahead of time, because in 2024 I subscribed to a bad AI service, and had to change my credit card number to keep them from billing me.

Here’s the long version of what I found when researching these questions.

Getting Access to Veo 3

No Free Access
Free Gemini accounts don’t get Veo 3 video generations.

If you subscribe to Google AI Pro, you get three Veo 3 “Fast” video generations per day through the Gemini app.

With the Ultra plan, you’re bumped up to five generations per day.

In the Gemini app, these generations don’t cost credits, but you’re capped at those daily limits. 

Want more? You’ll need to use Google’s Flow tool, where generations use credits.

Using Your Google AI Ultra Credits
When you subscribe for Ultra, you’re given 25,000 credits per month. As credits aren’t directly used in the Gemini interface, to generate more than five videos a day you need to sign into Google Labs Flow. Here you can generate as many videos as you want until your credits run out, and then you can buy more.

Third Party Sources
As I mentioned, using the Veo 3 model is sometimes available through sites not affiliated with Google. For example, LTX Studio offers this. You pay them their subscription fee (varies by plan), and then they meter your access to Google’s model. As far as I know, LTX Studio is legitimate, and I’m sure there are others.

Before I did all this research, though, I was confused by Veo3.ai. They say they aren’t affiliated with Google, but that’s a pretty spot-on name that comes up easily in the search results. They say they use Google’s model and sell a credit package for $49.99, which seems like a lot less of a risk than signing up for Google AI Ultra at $124.99 per month.

I found too many sources indicating that Veo3.ai is a potential security risk to use to sign up for them. But let’s say they’re legitimate. Are they offering a good deal?

To answer that question, we need to figure out how much money a credit is worth.  

The Value of a Credit

If you sign up for Google AI Ultra, for the first 3 months of your subscription at $124.99, you get 25,000 credits per month.

At this price each credit costs you 0.5 cents.

When you are using your credits in Flow, the usage depends on the model you pick, and number of outputs per prompt generation.

You can choose between four models:

Veo 2 – Fast (10 credits per output)
Veo 3 – Fast (0 credits per output)
Veo 2 – Quality (100 credits per output)
Veo 3 – Quality Beta (100 credits per output)

For the purposes of this post, we don’t need to get into the weeds over all the differences between these options. It’s enough to know that Veo 2 – Fast is the most primitive and doesn’t create audio, while Veo 3 – Quality Beta is the fanciest and creates audio. Videos made with it are probably what most people who are trying to get access want to do.

For each model, when you enter a prompt, you can have the AI generate between one and four outputs. Because each output is a little different even with the same prompt, generating several at once can save time because you’re more likely to get something you like. However, if there’s a problem with the prompt, it can be costly to find that out from four bad outputs at once.

Here is a breakdown of how many credits you can spend, depending on your settings:

Veo 2 – Fast (10 credits per output)
1 output: 10 credits
2 outputs: 20 credits
3 outputs: 30 credits
4 outputs: 40 credits

Veo 3 – Fast (0 credits per output)
This is anecdotal, but in my experience the quality of these outputs noticeably dropped when they were switched from their old cost of 20 credits to being free.

Veo 2 – Quality or Veo 3 – Quality Beta (both 100 credits per output)
1 output: 100 credits
2 outputs: 200 credits
3 outputs: 300 credits
4 outputs: 400 credits

Each output can be as low as 0 credits or as high as 400, depending on your settings. At $0.005 per credit, you’re paying between $0.00 and $2.00 per generation.

When the 3-month promotional period ends for Google AI Ultra and the price doubles from $124.99 to $249.99, the credit usage stays the same—but your cost per credit doubles from $0.005 to $0.01.

Now, each generation will cost between $0.00 and $4.00.

How does Veo3.ai stack up? Their cheapest monthly plan is $49.99 for 7,500 credits. Keep in mind these are credits to use through their website, not interchangeable with Google’s credits. However, that’s a cost of $0.0067 per credit, about 33 percent cheaper than Google’s $0.01 per credit.

According to Veo3.ai, there are two options for a Veo 3 model video generation:

Fast: 200 credits per generation.
Quality: 1,000 credits per generation.

They don’t say how many videos are created per generation. I’m going to proceed as if it is only one, figuring if it were more, they would announce that.

So now the question becomes, never mind how much each credit costs—how much does each generation cost?

Actual Cost Per Generation

Veo3.ai Fast: 200 credits × $0.0067 = $1.34 per output.
Veo3.ai Quality: 1,000 credits × $0.0067 = $6.70 per output.

Using Google’s Veo 3 directly (single output for comparison):
Fast: free.
Quality: 100 credits × $0.005 = $0.50 per single output.

Credit Value Comparison
Even though Veo3.ai credits cost less per credit, they require 10x more credits per generation. The lower per-credit price is misleading.

Unless Veo3.ai is giving you multiple outputs per generation—which they don’t advertise—you’re paying significantly more per video.

What Happens After the 3 Month Promotional Period Ends and Google Costs Double?

Google AI Ultra (after 3 months): $249.99 ÷ 12,500 credits = $0.02 per credit.

Actual Cost Per Generation After Price Increase (Google Veo 3):
Fast: free.
Quality: 100 credits × $0.01 = $1.00 per single output.

Veo3.ai (unchanged):
Fast: $1.34 per output.
Quality: $6.70 per output.

Even though Veo3.ai credits look cheaper, each generation uses far more of them. With Veo 3 Fast now being completely free for Ultra AI subscribers, and the overall quantity of credits doubling to 25,000 from the old 12,500, Google's official option is dramatically more cost-effective.

Now, if Veo3.ai quietly generates four outputs per generation—and just doesn’t advertise it—that would cut their cost per output to about $0.34 (Fast) or $1.68 (Quality).

That's still far more expensive than Google's Veo 3 Fast option (which costs 0 credits for Ultra subscribers) and more expensive than Google's Quality pricing even after the promo period ends.

It’s possible, but in the absence of clear information, it’s safer to assume one output per generation than that they are secretly generous. I researched this question of how many outputs it makes per generation, but was not able to find any specifics, beyond warnings that Veo3.ai provides a poor user experience and is probably a scam site.

If you'd rather skip the credits, subscriptions, and pricing headaches and just get video ads for your business, here's my work and here's how to reach me.

When Is It Worth Hiring a Writer Vs. Doing It Yourself?

When Is It Worth Hiring a Writer Vs. Doing It Yourself?

Hiring a writer costs money. ChatGPT is free, and most of us know somebody who will write content for no charge. Good deal, right?

It’s natural to wonder when it’s worth the cash expenditure of hiring a writer instead of just getting it done yourself.

Because I’m somebody who sells writing services, you might think I’d always recommend hiring a professional. Sometimes, though, you really are fine on your own.

When DIY writing works

  • You’re cranking out emails and messages within your company. They aren’t fancy but just need to get the point across.
  • You genuinely enjoy writing, have skills for it, and have the time it takes to be done right.
  • You’re okay with simple, straightforward content. It might not always be pretty, but it gets the job done.
  • Your free help is actually good at writing—and meets deadlines.

If one or more of these conditions are met, you probably don’t need to hire anybody.

Signs that you might need to hire a writer

  • Writing is draining a significant amount of your time or energy, that you know should be focused on other things.
  • Your spouse/friend/colleague, who also isn’t a writer, gives you a polite “it’s good” no matter what you’ve written.
  • You’re using AI, and it sounds like AI.
  • Projects keep getting stuck at the writing phase longer than you’d like.
  • The “free help” is not providing the quality you need, is not consistently available, or is slow.
  • People keep asking clarifying questions about things you thought were clear.

If one or more of these things sound a little too familiar, you’ll most likely benefit from hiring someone to sling words for you.

When deciding what to do, the question isn’t whether you can write your own content. You almost certainly can. It’s whether you benefit from doing it yourself.

What’s your experience been so far?

If you’re working on something that needs writing, contact me. I’m here to help.

How to Spot AI Writing Without a Detector

How to Spot AI Writing Without a Detector

My observations are most applicable to text generated by ChatGPT-4 and 4o. While these models will come and go — or have gone, if you’re reading this in the future — they’ve already pumped out a lot of words. How many? I asked ChatGPT, and it estimates over a trillion, but it really can’t say. Give or take a few billion words, we’ll be living with them for years to come, kind of the writing equivalent of polyester bell bottoms at the thrift store.

As long as this era’s content is haunting the internet, spotting it could be useful for judging what you see, and avoiding sounding like 2024’s AI yourself.

You don’t need to be plugged in to spot AI writing.

A person sitting on the floor surrounded by computers and wearing VR goggles with a red glow.

1. Formatting With Bullet Points and Bold Type

AI behaves as if following a template. In its default state, it “wants” to give you a standard word count and structure, while incorporating whatever you have asked for. Because of this, it falls into generic patterns, which become obvious when you know what to look for.

Look for: Patterns where the content is about a page long with bulleted or numbered lists and bold type.

Example

Prompt: “Describe an oak tree like it is a product you are trying to sell.

Introducing the Oak Tree: Nature’s Masterpiece of Strength and Beauty
Discover the timeless elegance and unrivaled durability of the Oak Tree, your ultimate investment in outdoor luxury. Perfect for transforming any landscape into a serene, stately environment, this tree delivers decades of natural beauty, clean air, and reliable shade.

Key Features:

  • Superior Longevity: Oaks are built to last, thriving for hundreds of years with minimal maintenance.
  • Natural Canopy: The expansive, dense leaves create a wide-reaching canopy, perfect for shade during hot summers.
  • Wildlife Magnet: Enhance biodiversity with an ecosystem that supports birds, squirrels, and beneficial insects.
  • Hardy & Resilient: Resistant to harsh weather conditions and adaptable to most climates.
  • Eco-Friendly: Improve your environment by absorbing CO2 and releasing oxygen, creating a cleaner, greener space.

Perfect for homeowners, landscapers, and anyone looking to make a statement with their yard, the Oak Tree is more than just a plant—it’s a legacy! Grow something that stands the test of time, all while enhancing your outdoor space with its majestic presence.

2. Formatting With Repetitive Lists

In this variation on formatting, the AI makes lists that are not bullet points, but are separated by paragraph spaces. These lists usually contain entries that are nearly the same length. The most common way to see them is bolded, numbered lists with a colon, or a header followed by text.

Look for: Several segments in a row of very similar length. If you see this, here’s a good chance AI wrote the text. You don’t need to read the content to recognize the pattern.

Example

1. The Sun: The Sun is the center of our solar system, a massive star composed mostly of hydrogen and helium. It provides the energy that supports life on Earth and drives the climates of all the planets. Its powerful gravitational pull keeps the solar system in place, guiding the orbits of planets, asteroids, and comets.

2. The Inner Planets: Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars make up the inner solar system. These terrestrial planets have solid, rocky surfaces and vary greatly in terms of atmosphere, climate, and potential for life. Mars, in particular, has been the subject of intense study due to its potential for past life and human exploration.

3. The Outer Planets: Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, often referred to as gas giants, dominate the outer solar system. These massive planets are primarily composed of hydrogen and helium, with thick atmospheres and numerous moons. Saturn’s rings and Jupiter’s storms, including the Great Red Spot, are iconic features that captivate astronomers.

Occasionally the numbers are removed, and there are slightly larger chunks of text beneath a header:

Early Battery Concepts
The invention of the battery began with simple electrochemical experiments in the late 18th century. Alessandro Volta is credited with creating the first true battery, the “voltaic pile,” in 1800. This invention used alternating layers of zinc and copper, separated by pieces of cloth soaked in saltwater, to produce a continuous electrical current. The voltaic pile represented a breakthrough in understanding electricity, allowing scientists to conduct experiments that were previously impossible. It laid the groundwork for modern electrochemistry and introduced the possibility of storing electrical energy.

Modern Battery Development
Over time, batteries evolved as scientists sought more efficient and powerful energy storage methods. In 1859, Gaston Planté invented the lead-acid battery, which became the first rechargeable battery. This type of battery remains in widespread use, particularly in vehicles. The 20th century saw the development of the nickel-cadmium (Ni-Cd) and lithium-ion batteries. Lithium-ion, first developed in the 1980s, revolutionized energy storage due to its high energy density and rechargeability, powering everything from smartphones to electric vehicles. Battery technology continues to advance, with innovations focused on sustainability and capacity.

3. AI’s Favorite Words

There are a few words that AI really likes to use. Ensure, just, and whether are often overused. I see this constantly with AI writing. At this point, I don’t use the word “ensure” with human writing, because it’s so overused by AI it increases the chance people will think (either consciously or subconsciously) that it was generated by ChatGPT.

Look for: “Ensure” and other favorite AI words. This article has more about overused words.

Example

  • Ensure
  • Ensuring
  • Ensured
  • Enhance
  • Enhancing
  • Enhanced
  • Just
  • Whether

4. Sentence Structure

There are a few sentence structures that AI often uses. Sentences constructed around “not just” and “whether” statements are used frequently along with dashes, colons, and hyphens.

Look for: A repetitive structure and cadence.

Example

“They’re not just clients—they’re long-term partners in our success.”

“It’s not just the clouds in the sky—it’s the way they paint ever-changing stories with light and shadow.”

Another very common one is the “whether” sentence:

“Whether eaten on its own or transformed into cider or sauce, the apple has a way of finding its place in every season and every kitchen.”

Or from the text I generated earlier: “Experience unparalleled productivity with our Desktop Computer, engineered to meet your every need—whether you’re working, gaming, or creating.”

As you’ve probably noticed, colons and dashes are also a staple of AI writing:

“There’s a certain excitement in being surrounded by the unfamiliar, where every corner you turn offers a surprise: a café you’ve never seen, a hidden park, or a lively market filled with voices speaking in a language you may or may not understand. The sounds, sights, and even the feel of the city beneath your feet as you explore become a part of the adventure, and slowly, you begin to get a sense of the city’s character. Each day holds the promise of discovery—whether it’s a new street to wander, a local dish to try, or simply a quiet spot to sit and observe the flow of life in this new place. And by the time you leave, you carry with you not just photos or souvenirs, but a deeper sense of connection to a place you now feel a little more familiar with.”


Colons and dashes aren’t used in every sentence, and plenty of humans use them, but when you see them it’s worth taking notice. I’ve also found that AI uses hyphenated words slightly more often than human writers.

Sometimes, especially if you ask for lists, AI will give you multiple sentences with the same format:

1. The sun began to set, and the city lit up with vibrant colors.
2. I wanted to explore the park, but the rain started pouring down.
3. She planned to visit the museum, yet she ran out of time.
4. He finished his work early, so we decided to grab coffee together.
5. The streets were quiet, and the only sound was the rustling of leaves in the breeze.

Too many sentences that are segmented by a comma can be repetitive to read, no matter who writes them, but they also signal the use of AI.

5. Too Many Adjectives

AI writing is often padded out with adjectives. This makes sense when you consider it’s attempting to hit a word count and follow the sentence structure it is comfortable using.

Look for: Wordy sentences full of adjectives.

Example

Here is ChatGPT-4o describing a generic winter jacket:

“Indulge in the ultimate winter experience with a jacket that exudes timeless elegance, offering unparalleled warmth and protection without sacrificing style. This jacket is designed for those who demand the best of both worlds: impeccable fashion and the highest level of winter comfort. Whether you’re navigating the snowy city streets or venturing into the great outdoors, our Winter Jacket promises to keep you incredibly warm, effortlessly stylish, and endlessly comfortable throughout the season.”

Here it is describing a rose:

“A rose is a masterpiece of nature, each bloom unfolding in soft layers that seem to swirl endlessly toward the center. Its petals, velvety to the touch, range from deep, rich reds to delicate blush pinks, creating a spectrum of color that feels both luxurious and serene. The fragrance it releases is subtle yet enchanting, filling the air with a sweet, almost nostalgic scent that lingers long after you walk away.”

6. Earnest & Serious Tone

AI content tends to have a neutral tone, but can describe things like products and mission statements in a way that is earnest and serious, regardless of how trivial the subject might be. This is the hardest point for me to quantify, but I’ve seen it enough times that I want to mention it.

Look for: Overly earnest, serious tone in product descriptions, mission statements, and About Us pages. If it’s incongruous with the trivial subject matter, begin looking for other signs of AI writing.

Example

Prompt: “I’m selling novelty thimbles for sewing. Help describe them.”

Output: “These novelty thimbles are a fun and unique twist on a classic sewing tool. Each one is designed to bring personality and charm to your sewing kit, making the practical task of stitching more enjoyable. Whether adorned with playful designs, bright colors, or quirky shapes, these thimbles add a touch of creativity to your crafting routine. They’re perfect for collectors, hobbyists, or anyone looking to add a bit of flair to their sewing experience. Not only do they protect your fingers, but they also serve as a delightful conversation piece or a thoughtful gift for sewing enthusiasts.”

Prompt: “Give me a positive mission statement for my thimble business.”

Output: “Our mission is to bring creativity and joy to the world of sewing through unique, high-quality novelty thimbles. We aim to inspire crafters and collectors alike by offering charming and playful designs that turn a timeless tool into a delightful experience. At the heart of our business is the belief that even the smallest details can make a big difference, sparking imagination and adding fun to every stitch.”

Points to Remember

When reading something and trying to figure out if it’s AI, ask yourself the following questions:

1. Is it about a page long with bulleted or numbered lists and bold type?

2. Are there several short sections in a row, often with headings, of very similar length?

3. Does it use words like “ensure” or “enhance”?

4. Do you see a repetitive cadence? “Not just” and “whether” being used frequently along with dashes, colons, and hyphenated words.

5. Are the sentences consistently wordy and full of adjectives?

6. Is the tone earnest and serious in a way that’s inconsistent with the trivial subject matter?

There are other telltale signs of AI writing, but being able to spot these 6 will take you a long way, either in recognizing AI text when you read it, or in keeping your text from sounding like just more ChatGPT content.

If you need human intelligence writing done for you, contact me. I’m here to help.